Carbon Footprint
Measuring our impact
Measuring our impact
In line with EUR's sustainability ambitions, various carbon-reducing actions and initiatives have been implemented in 2023 (see the chapter on Operations). To better measure their impact, the Real Estate & Facility department started reporting on EUR's annual carbon footprint in 2011. Each year, we strive to enhance the quality of these reports and provide the best possible picture of EUR's impact on the natural environment. For instance, in 2015, the Greenhouse Gas Protocol framework was established for EUR, and in 2021, the construction of the new Langeveld building was included in the calculations.
The urgency of climate change, environmental degradation and the need for sustainable development have led to increasing pressure on companies to reduce their negative impact on the environment and society. Consequently, corporate sustainability reporting methods are continuously adapted to incorporate new insights, calculation methodologies and (inter)national policies.
The existing Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD), introduced by the European Union, fell short in providing consistent and reliable sustainability information, making it difficult for investors, customers, and stakeholders to accurately assess the sustainability performance of companies. Aligned with the European Green Deal, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), introduced in 2023, requires companies to provide detailed and standardized sustainability reports. These are essential for achieving the EU’s goal of climate neutrality by 2050.
Eventually, educational institutions will also be required to report their environmental impact according to CSRD standards. Therefore, Erasmus University Rotterdam has decided to start improving our carbon footprint scope by implementing different calculation methods and using spend-based analyses to meet these requirements. As a result, the carbon footprint calculations for 2022 and 2023 available below comply with CSRD requirements.
EUR calculates its carbon footprint using methods and standards developed by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHG). The protocol comprises three scopes, with which specific emissions are associated:
scope 1: direct emissions, over which the university has control;
scope 2: direct emissions from power generation, which are under the university's control, but which are emitted outside its organisational boundaries; and
scope 3: indirect emissions, over which the university has limited control.
The image below shows the sources of the emissions.
The annual financial reports served as the basis for calculating the EUR's environmental impact. Based on the university’s financial reports, the relevant monetary items within its operations were identified, and the legal entities were mapped out. These monetary items were largely converted from euros to CO2 equivalents using a spend-based analysis. In short, the carbon footprint calculations represent the impact of every euro that EUR spent within its operations in 2022 and 2023. However, qualitative data from our stakeholders was used instead of spend-based data where available.
| Scopes | 2022 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 28 | 186 |
| Fugitive emissions | 7 | 137 |
| Stationary combustion | 20 | 49 |
| Scope 2 | 7,172 | 5,575 |
| Indirect emissions from the use of electricity | 6,327 | 4,700 |
| Indirect emissions from the use of heating | 845 | 875 |
| Scope 3 | 33,794 | 23,356 |
| Purchased goods and services | 12.011 | 13,686 |
| Business travel | 3,126 | 4,586 |
| Fuel-and energy-related activities not included in scope 1 or scope 2 | 373 | 364 |
| Employee commuting | 928 | 1,286 |
| Waste generated in operations | 9 | 11 |
| Capital goods | 17,347 | 3,424 |
| Grand Total | 40,994 | 29,117 |
'Location-based approach' indicates the climate impact of the average electricity mix of the regions/countries where facilities are located. In contrast, in the 'market-based approach', it's calculated with the actual impact of specific energy supplier (if known). According to CSRD, all organizations have to report the results for both approaches.
| Scopes | 2022 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 28 | 186 |
| Fugitive emissions | 7 | 137 |
| Stationary combustion | 20 | 49 |
| Scope 2 | 845 | 875 |
| Indirect emissions from the use of electricity | 0 | 0 |
| Indirect emissions from the use of heating | 845 | 875 |
| Scope 3 | 33,794 | 23,356 |
| Purchased goods and services | 12,011 | 13,686 |
| Business travel | 3,126 | 4,586 |
| Fuel-and energy-related activities not included in scope 1 or scope 2 | 373 | 364 |
| Employee commuting | 928 | 1,286 |
| Waste generated in operations | 9 | 11 |
| Capital goods | 17,347 | 3,424 |
| Grand Total | 34,667 | 24,417 |
The chart above in tabular form:
| Scope | emmissions |
|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 28 |
| Scope 2 | 845 |
| Scope 3 | 33794 |
Carbon footprint in tonnes; market-based approach.
The chart above in tabular form:
| Scope 3 | Emissions |
|---|---|
| Purchased goods and services | 12011 |
| Business travel | 3126 |
| Fuel-and energy-related activities not included in scope 1 or scope 2 | 373 |
| Employee commuting | 928 |
| Waste generated in operations | 9 |
| Capital goods | 17347 |
The chart above in tabular form:
| Scope | emmissions |
|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 186 |
| Scope 2 | 875 |
| Scope 3 | 23356 |
Carbon footprint in tonnes; market-based approach.
The chart above in tabular form:
| Scope 3 | Emissions |
|---|---|
| Purchased goods and services | 13686 |
| Business travel | 4586 |
| Fuel-and energy-related activities not included in scope 1 or scope 2 | 364 |
| Employee commuting | 1286 |
| Waste generated in operations | 11 |
| Capital goods | 3424 |
In 2022, the largest contributor to EUR’s climate impact was the GHG category ‘Capital Goods,’ followed by ‘Purchased Goods and Services’. In 2023, the latter became the largest contributor. Together, these two categories accounted for around 85% of the total (market-based) impact in 2022 and 75% in 2023. That year, the second-largest contributor to EUR’s climate impact was the category ‘Business Travel,’ which made up around 20% of the total impact.
The category of ‘Purchased Goods and Services’ consists of various services such as cleaning (GOM) and catering (VITAM, Maas, JDE, Erasmus Sport). However, the impact of these services is relatively small compared to others. The categories that produce the highest CO2 emissions are outsourced work (primarily tasks performed by external parties or subcontractors), such as IT services involving software licenses, computer equipment, and reproduction costs.
‘Capital Goods’ mainly refers to activities related to newly constructed buildings and the maintenance of existing properties. The carbon footprint of capital goods varied significantly between 2022 and 2023, primarily due to the construction of two new buildings on campus: Erasmus Sport and Langeveld.
The reason ‘Purchased Goods and Services’ had a higher environmental impact in 2023 is likely still related to the COVID-19 pandemic and the national lockdown. In other words, 2023 was a post-COVID year, during which more activities and services were conducted compared to the lockdown period and the partly closed campus in 2022.
Decarbonization of activities is the only way to keep 1.5 degree global goal alive.
In 2024, the Marketing & Communication (M&C) department calculated event emissions with insights from our partner Phi Factory. Going beyond neutrality, we doubled our compensation for emissions from the Opening of the Academic Year and Dies Natalis, resulting in eco-positive events.
Furthermore, M&C shared the sustainable events checklist with the EUR event management community. This checklist includes essential sustainable practices for event planning, and provides insights on making eco-friendly decisions throughout the planning process.
EUR employees actively working on the Sustainable Event Application, aiming to share it with the EUR event planning community and make it accessible beyond the university. The Sustainable Event Application will allow (EUR) event managers to plan CO2-neutral or even eco-positive events.
Based on national averages, about half of the CO2 emissions from cleaning services are linked to the commuting of cleaning staff. However, EUR is a positive exception: most of the cleaning staff already use public transport, walk or bike to work, while only a small fraction drives. What's more, those who do drive frequently carpool. This is an encouraging finding from a carbon footprint perspective, allowing the cleaning company (GOM) to concentrate on other sustainability areas where further improvements can be made.
The results from 2022 and 2023 show that the CO2 footprint is significantly higher than in 2021. One of the main reasons for this increase is the use of a different calculation method, specifically a spend-based analysis. This expanded scope has resulted in higher CO2 emissions compared to previous reporting years. However, other universities and universities of applied sciences in the Netherlands will also need to report in compliance with CSRD in the coming years. This will likely reveal similar significant differences in CO2 emissions compared to previous years.
EUR will prioritise reduction efforts within the most impactful categories identified. Additionally, improving data quality is considered a foundational step for more precise decision-making. Therefore, one of the challenges in the coming years will be improving data quality for activities with the highest expenditures, such as 'Capital Goods' and 'Purchased Goods and Services.' By shifting from spend-based analyses to supplier-specific emission factors per physical unit, the impact of sustainability policies will become more transparent. This approach will also help automatically reduce EUR’s CO2 footprint.